The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gambling.

No, they weren't personally in participation, however the world-famous stars were conspicuously included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable sites using both free casino-style games and profitable prizes, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous video gaming corporations, not to discuss claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as conventional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gambling levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the company faces allegations of unlawful gaming in a New york city suit that claims VGW utilizes celebrity endorsers to 'create a veneer of authenticity' around its product. (See VGW's declaration below)

'I'm unsure" if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a series of celebrities from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions between standard gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where many - but not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he routinely promotes on social networks

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads typically focus around the social aspect of the casinos, while omitting the capacity for actual sports betting losses.

Others tempt clients with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement flaunting Drake's vehicles, aircrafts and estates before rotating to video footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never ever gave up.'

The inconsistency in between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for complimentary.

'Most social sweeps consumers never buy,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online sports betting websites.'

Social gambling establishments use customers an opportunity to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, however can be used to open numerous functions within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, allowing clients to acquire other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's cars, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7 states, which has actually assisted to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require typically need identification. However, sites like Chumba will request IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow clients to send mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins just for registering, thereby providing them a reason to try their hands at any variety of casino video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a way of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a kind of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever have to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a vital distinction between social sweeps and traditional online gambling sites like casinos.'

Think of the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that provide them the chance to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself does not satisfy the meaning of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all kinds of everyday businesses in the United States, everything from burgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are regularly utilized by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of gambling industry insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For starters, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thereby suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last forever and they're typically not connected to casino-style video games of chance,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the attributes commonly connected with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payments, generally 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the normal payout portion for a short-lived promotional sweepstakes is a minor share of the earnings earned by the business [generally less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, using clients the possibility to play casino-style video games for genuine rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually considering that been shuttered over allegations of unlawful gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to deal with comparable scrutiny.

'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually consistently been cited by courts and state lawyer generals as key aspects in determining that a sweepstakes promotion remained in reality a guise for unlawful gaming.'

Among the gambling establishment market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are giving up considerable tax and income opportunities as this gaming changes that carried out through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have taken legal action against social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current suit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New york city state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'illegal gaming business. '

Apple and Google have likewise been named as defendants in claims for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We usually do not talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play video games across the majority of North America, as we have for more than a years, developing not just fantastic video games, user experiences and home entertainment, but also guaranteeing this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively common across the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to vigorously protect any claim which might be brought versus us.'

The problems between traditional online gaming and sweepstakes casinos might prove troublesome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking illegal sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the very same time the leagues want to forecast a strong position versus prohibited gambling - specifically when attempting to tamp down the occasional gambling scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting apparently illegal gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA representative nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise disregarded to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to clients the differences and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our organization practices more broadly,' the representative stated. 'A few of our worths are" our players come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious illegal gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who declare damage,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state lawyers general rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating prohibited gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton